The Emancipation Proclamation
– In Robert A. Godwin, ed., 100 Years of Emancipation (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963). Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).Excerpt: Both in the pre-inaugural period, and in the opening stages of the conflict, the danger of disunion, now the paramount danger, did not come from the forces of slavery alone. It came as well from the abolitionists. Now the name… More
Joseph Cropsey, Rest in Peace
– The Claremont Institute, January 13, 2015.Excerpt: Our lives were twined and intertwined in many ways. Joe entered the doctoral program in economics at Columbia soon after receiving his undergraduate degree in the spring of 1939. If anyone had told him then that his career would be in political… More
The End of History Means the End of Freedom
– The Claremont Institute, January 13, 2015.Excerpt: Mr. Fukuyama is a disciple of the late Alexander Kojeve, who re-interpreted Hegel’s version of the “end of history” to justify his support of the regime of Josef Stalin. Now Mr. Fukuyama re-interprets Kojeve’s reinterpretation… More
Can There Be Another Winston Churchill?
– The Claremont Institute, January 13, 2015.Excerpt: On the night of the tenth of May, 1940, on the eve of the ill-fated Battle of France, Churchill became Prime Minister of Great Britain. As he went to bed, he tells us, at about 3 a.m., he was “conscious of a profound sense of relief. At last I… More
The Party of Lincoln vs. The Party of Bureaucrats
– The Claremont Institute, June 9, 2014.Excerpt: In the fall of 1964, I was on the speech-writing staff of the Goldwater campaign. In September and October I went on a number of forays to college campuses, where I debated spokesmen for our opponents. My argument always started from here: In 1964… More
Aristotle and the Higher Good
– New York Times, July 1, 2011.Excerpt: Some time in the 1920s, the Conservative statesman F. E. Smith — Lord Birkenhead — gave a copy of the “Nicomachean Ethics” to his close friend Winston Churchill. He did so saying there were those who thought this was the greatest book of all… More
Thoreau and Lincoln
– From A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau, ed. Jack Turner (Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2010). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Lincoln in Peoria
– Claremont Review of Books, Fall 2009.Excerpt: A friendly critic has recently characterized my life’s work as dedicated to the moral vision of Athens, Jerusalem, and Peoria. Of course, as a faithful student of Leo Strauss, I recognized and welcomed the association with Athens and Jerusalem,… More
A Reply to Michael Zuckert’s “Jaffa’s New Birth: Harry Jaffa at Ninety”
– The Review of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 2 (Spring 2009), pp. 241-250.Too Good to be True? A Reply to Robert Kraynak’s “Moral Order in the Western Tradition: Harry Jaffa’s Grand Synthesis of Athens, Jerusalem, and Peoria”
– The Review of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 2 (Spring 2009), pp. 224-240.Dred Scott Revisited
– Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 31:1 (Winter 2008).The American Founding as the Best Regime
– The Claremont Institute, July 4, 2007.Excerpt: The Preamble of the Constitution crowns its enumeration of the ends of the Constitution by declaring its purpose to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” No words of the Constitution reveal the intention of the… More
Macbeth and the Moral Universe
– Adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College in 1974. Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2007/08.Excerpt: Macbeth is a moral play par excellence. In this, it stands in stark contrast to two more recent well-known tales of murder, Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment and Camus’s The Stranger. In Macbeth Shakespeare presented the moral… More
Who Owns the Copyright to the Universe?
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2006.Excerpt: In a Wall Street Journal essay, James Q. Wilson praised a Pennsylvania federal judge’s decision to strike down efforts of a local school board to have “intelligent design” taught, alongside evolution, as part of a science… More
Thomas Aquinas Meets Thomas Jefferson
– Interpretation 33:2 (Spring 2006).The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century. He brings under fire the claim of the Court (and its partisans) to… More
The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would appoint justices to the Court in the mold of Antonin Scalia and… More
Wages of Sin
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2004.Excerpt: Among the young scholars in the 1950s who challenged the prevailing historical canon on slavery, no less than Fogel, was one he never mentions. Before the publication of Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the… More
American Conservatism and the Present Crisis
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2003.Excerpt: Roger Scruton, writing in the Wall Street Journal last December, declared that “September 11 was a wake up call through which liberals have managed to go on dreaming. American conservatives ought to seize the opportunity to utter those… More
L’Envoi to Woody Hayes
– The Claremont Institute, January 3, 2003.Excerpt: History will record that Woody Hayes (who died March 12, 1987) and I began our careers at Ohio State the same year, 1951. No one in the press has taken note of this fact, and history is always slow about such things, so I will climb down from my… More
Abraham Lincoln and the Universal Meaning of the Declaration of Independence
– In Scott Douglas Gerber, ed., The Declaration Of Independence: Origins and Impact (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2002).The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to that of slavery, and especially to compare Roe v. Wade to Dred Scott.… More
The Peace Process Is Dead. Let’s Bury It.
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2001.Excerpt: The Oslo “Peace Process” is dead. It is time for a public burial, before the corpse infects the landscape even more than it has already. As the fighting between Israelis and Palestine Liberation Organization-led Palestinians escalates,… More
Defenders of the Constitution: Calhoun Versus Madison, a Bicentennial Cerebration
– Symposium, "James Madison: Philosopher and Practitioner of Liberal Democracy," Library of Congress, March 16, 2001.Excerpt: In 1987, the Center for Judicial Studies, a Conservative think tank in the precincts of the nation’s capital–a think tank, sometimes referred to as by appointment to the Justice Department of Attorney General Edwin Meese III–offered… More
Aristotle and Locke in the American Founding
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2001.Excerpt: In his review of A New Birth of Freedom: Abraham Lincoln and the Coming of the Civil War, in the inaugural issue of the Claremont Review of Books, Charles Kesler writes, “Jaffa doesn’t draw attention to his revised view of Lincoln or of… More
Chastity as a Political Principle: An Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure
– In John Alvis and Thomas G. West, eds., Shakespeare as Political Thinker, 2nd Edition (Wilmington, DE: ISI, 2000).Excerpt: The city of Vienna is in bad shape. It has been misruled, or allowed to go without being ruled, for no less than fourteen years. The nominal ruler is a philosopher. However good philosophic rule may be in theory, in practice it seems to be nearly the… More
The Unity of Tragedy, Comedy, and History: An Interpretation of the Shakespearean Universe
– In John E. Alvis and Thomas G. West, eds., Shakespeare as Political Thinker, 2nd Edition (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2000).In Defense of Special Interests
– The Weekly Standard, January 31, 2000, pp. 13-14.Strauss at 100
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, January 13, 2015. In Kenneth L. Deutsch and John A. Murley, Leo Strauss, the Straussians, and the American Regime (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999).Excerpt: It is almost routine in the scholarship of greatness, whether philosophic or political, to discover fathomless complexity in its subjects. Certainly this has been true about Lincoln. Yet in the case of Lincoln, as in that of many others, the… More
Why CCRI Is Constitutional
– The Weekly Standard, April 21, 1997.The Speech That Changed the World
– Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy Vol. 24 Issue 3 (Spring 1997).Excerpt: Of all Lincoln’s speeches, whether greater or lesser, the only one that can be said truly to have changed the course of history, was delivered to the Republican State Convention in Springfield, Illinois, June 16, 1858. The utterances that have… More
God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist regarding judicial activism. The author argues that legal positivism,… More
Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).Defending the Cause of Human Freedom
– The Claremont Institute, April 15, 1994.Excerpt: The Spring 1994 Intercollegiate Review featured a section entitled “Not In Memoriam, But in Affirmation: M. E. Bradford.” I welcome this, or any tribute, to my departed friend. As many readers of Intercollegiate Review know, my eulogy of… More
Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Leo Strauss, the Bible, and Political Philosophy
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, January 13, 2015. In Kenneth L. Deutsch and Walter Nicgorski, eds. Leo Strauss: Political Philosopher and Jewish Thinker (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994).Excerpt: From this perspective, the intention of the American Founding, with its separation of church and state, its guarantee of the free exercise of religion, and of freedom of speech and of the press, could be seen, not as a lowering of the goals of… More
Mel Bradford, RIP
– National Review, April 12, 1993, p. 50.Inventing the Gettysburg Address
– Intercollegiate Review 28:1 (Fall 1992). Reprinted in American Conservatism and the American Founding (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1984).Excerpt: Thirty years ago, Garry Wills was a rising star of the Right, a celebrity in the constellation of William F. Buckley, Jr. and National Review. His essay on “The Convenient State,” originally published in 1964 in What Is Conservatism?, a… More
In Defense of Churchill
– Modern Age, Spring 1992, pp. 277-282.Of Men, Hogs, and Law
– National Review, February 3, 1992, pp. 40-41.The Anti-Anti-Smoking Brigade
– National Review, November 5, 1990, p. 85.Description: Discusses perceptions on how to solve the problem of tobacco smoking addiction. Discussion of the impact of smoking on the health of Americans; Suggestion that moral influence be used as a mitigating factor to initiate self-change.
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).“Who Killed Cock Robin?” A Retrospective on the Bork Nomination and a Reply to “Jaffa Divides the House”
– Seattle University Law Review 13:3 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In an utterance that may have changed the history of the United States, and of the world, Lincoln argued that the grounds upon which one opposed the extension of slavery into the territories was inseparable from opposition to slavery itself.… More
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Lincoln’s Character Assassins
– National Review, January 22, 1990, pp. 34-39.A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Humanizing Certitudes and Impoverishing Doubts: A Critique of The Closing of the American Mind
– Interpretation Vol. 16, No. 1 (Fall 1988).Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the Declaration of Independence were originally intended to be the principles of… More
What is Political Science? Or How to Deal with the Lemming (or Gadarene Swine) Instinct
– Claremont, CA: Salvatori Center for the Study of Freedom, 1988.Old Thinking For New Suckers
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 1988.Excerpt: This offering by the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the U.S.S.R. reminds me of a New Yorker cartoon of some years back. Company big shots are sitting around the conference table, in the middle of which is a large box. On the box is… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Crisis of the Strauss Divided: The Legacy Reconsidered
– Social Research, Vol. 54, No. 3, Bicentennial of the Constitution (Autumn 1987), pp. 579-603.Dear Professor Drury
– Political Theory, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Aug., 1987), pp. 316-325.What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history have always been differences concerning the meaning of the… More
Equality, Liberty, Wisdom, Morality and Consent in the Idea of Political Freedom
– Interpretation Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 1987).On the Education of the Guardians of Freedom
– Modern Age, Spring 1986, pp. 131-140. Reprinted in American Conservatism and the American Founding (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1984).Leo Strauss’s Churchillian Speech and the Question of the Decline of the West
– Teaching Political Science 12:2 (Winter 1985).Patriotism, American Style
– National Review, November 29, 1985, pp. 34-37.The Studies of Leo Strauss: An Exchange
– Letters, New York Review of Books, October 10, 1985.Excerpt: Before I met Strauss this is what I had been taught, and had never been given any reason to question. I had spent five years at Yale in the 1930s, as undergraduate and graduate student, where no one, so far as I knew, had ever doubted this orthodoxy.… More
Bradford and Jaffa: Once More on Lincoln
– Harry V. Jaffa and Melvin E. Bradford, American Spectator, June 1985.Excerpt: Two eminent Lincoln scholars disagree on the legacy of Father Abraham.
The Legacy of Leo Strauss Defended
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 1985.Excerpt: Thomas Pangle declares that, in “The Legacy of Leo Strauss” (Claremont Review of Books, Fall 1984), I am “guilty of gross misinterpretation” of his “interpretation of Strauss and of the political philosophizing Strauss… More
The Legacy of Leo Strauss
– Claremont Review of Books, Fall 1984.Excerpt: In 1974, the year following Leo Strauss’s death, the American Political Science Association established an annual award, in his honor, for the best dissertation in the field of political philosophy. The petition in favor of such an award was… More
Goldwater’s Famous ‘Gaffe’
– National Review, August 10, 1984, pp. 36-37.“In Defense of Political Philosophy” Defended: A Rejoinder to Walter Berns
– Modern Age 27:3 (Summer/Fall 1983). Reprinted in American Conservatism and the American Founding (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1984).Leo Strauss, 1952, ’53
– Modern Age, Summer 1982, pp. 266-269. Reprinted in American Conservatism and the American Founding (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1984).In Defense of Political Philosophy
– National Review, January 22, 1982, pp. 36-37. Reprinted in American Conservatism and the American Founding (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1984).Inventing the Past
– The St. John's Review 33:1 (Autumn 1981).Help!!!: Another Look at the Declaration
– National Review, July 11, 1980, pp. 836-840. Reprinted in American Conservatism and the American Founding (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1984).On Mano’s ‘Jews for Jesus’: An Exchange
– With D. Keith Mano, National Review, December 9, 1977, p. 1433.Political Philosophy and Honor: The Leo Strauss Dissertation Award
– Modern Age 21:4 (Fall 1977). Reprinted in How to Think About the American Revolution: A Bicentennial Cerebration (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1978).Political Philosophy and Honor
– Modern Age, Fall 1977, pp. 387-394.Democracy, Good and Bad
– National Review, May 13, 1977, p. 553.The (Okay) Imperial Presidency
– National Review, February 4, 1977, pp. 160-161.Review of Roosevelt and Churchill, 1939-1941, by Joseph P. Lash.
Equality, Justice, and the American Revolution: In Reply to Bradford’s “The Heresy of Equality”
– Modern Age, Spring 1977. Reprinted in How to Think About the American Revolution: A Bicentennial Cerebration (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1978).The (Okay) Imperial Presidency
– National Review, February 4, 1977.The article reviews the book Roosevelt and Churchill, 1939-1941: The Partnership That Saved the West by Joseph P. Lash.
Equality as a Conservative Principle
– Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 8:471 (1975). Reprinted in How to Think About the American Revolution: A Bicentennial Cerebration (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 1978).Excerpt: That Conservatism should search for its meaning implies of course that Conservatism does not have the meaning for which it is searching. This might appear paradoxical, since a Conservative is supposed to have something definite to conserve.… More
Debate: “Time on the Cross”
– National Review, March 28, 1975.Review of Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery by Robert William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman.
Partly Federal, Partly National: On the Political Theory of the American Civil War
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Torpedoing the Lusitania Thesis
– National Review, March 15, 1974.The Achievements of Leo Strauss
– National Review, December 7, 1973.What about the Dardanelles?
– National Review, November 23, 1973.The Truth about War
– National Review, August 3, 1973.Review of Young Winston’s Wars: The Original Despatches of Winston S. Churchill, War Correspondent 1897-1900.
Portrait of a Patriot
– National Review, May 25, 1973. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen.
Contra Herndon
– National Review, March 30, 1973, p. 376.Review of Abraham Lincoln: Theologian of American Anguish by David Elton Trueblood.
Tom Sawyer: Hero of Middle America
– Interpretation, Spring 1972. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Excerpt: Tom Sawyer, master of the noble lie, is the master figure of American literature, the character in whom, more than in any other, Americans fancy themselves to be reflected and idealized. Not Captain Ahab, pursuing the great white whale, or Walter… More
Weathermen and Fort Sumter
– National Review, December 20, 1970.Spokesman for the Political Tradition
– National Review, October 6, 1970.Review of Agnew: Profile in Conflict by Jim G. Lucas.
The Limits of Dissent
– National Review, September 10, 1968, p. 911.Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by Abe Fortas.
The Virtue of a Nation of Cities
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of Cities (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966).Lincoln and the Cause of Freedom
– National Review, September 21, 1965, pp. 827-829. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Reconstruction, Old and New
– National Review, April 20, 1965.Review of The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 by Kenneth M. Stampp
On the Nature of Civil and Religious Liberty: Reflections on the Centennial of the Gettysburg Address
– In Melvin Laird, ed., The Conservative Papers (New York: Doubleday, 1964). Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).The Nature and Origin of the American Party System
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed., Political Parties U.S.A. (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964). Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).A Celebration of Tradition
– National Review, October 22, 1963, pp. 360-361.Review of Rationalism in Politics, and Other Essays by Michael J. Oakeshott.
Aristotle
– In Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey, eds. History of Political Philosophy, 2nd edition (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Conflicts within the Idea of the Liberal Tradition
– Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Apr., 1963), pp. 274-278.Review: Patriotism and Morality
– Chicago Review, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Summer/Autumn, 1962), pp. 136-142. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).Review of Congressman Abraham Lincoln by Donald W. Riddle.
Review: The Letters of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen
– The Journal of Southern History 28:2 (May 1962), pp. 251-253. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Strauss on Political Philosophy
– American Political Science Review 55:3 (September 1961).The U.S. and Revolution: An Occasional Paper on the Free Society
– (Santa Barbara, CA: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, 1961).The Case for a Stronger National Government
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed., A Nation of States: Essays on the American Federal System (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1961).Agrarian Virtue and Republican Freedom: An Historical Perspective
– In Goals and Values in Agricultural Policy (Des Moines: Iowa State University, 1961). Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).Reply to Allan Nevins’ review of Crisis of the House Divided
– New Leader (June 20, 1960).The Case Against Political Theory
– The Journal of Politics, Vol. 22, No. 2 (May 1960), pp. 259-275. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859: The Great Debate Continued
– In Harry V. Jaffa and Robert W. Johannsen, eds., In the Name of the People: Speeches and Writings of Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859 (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959). Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).“Value Consensus” in Democracy: The Issue in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 745-753. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).Slavery — A Battle Revisited
– New Leader 41:30 (August 18-25, 1958). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Created Equal: The Complete Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 by Paul Angle.
The Limits of Politics: An Interpretation of King Lear, I: 1
– The American Political Science Review Vol. 51, No. 2 (Jun., 1957), pp. 405-427. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Expediency and Morality in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The Anchor Review 2 (1957).Comment on Oppenheim: In Defense of “The Natural Law Thesis”
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 51, No. 1 (Mar., 1957), pp. 54-64. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).Review: The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 50, No. 2 (June 1956), pp. 515-519.Review of The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political Ideas by Kurt von Fritz.
Review: Politics and Opinion in the Nineteenth Century: An Historical Introduction by John Bowle
– Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 297, Ethical Standards and Professional Conduct (January 1955), pp. 155-156.Review: Justice: An Historical and Philosophical Essay by Giorgio Del Vecchio
– The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 45:4 (November/December 1954), pp. 463-464.Review: Morals and Law: The Growth of Aristotle’s Legal Theory by Max Hamburger
– The American Political Science Review 47:2 (June 1953), pp. 546-547.Review: Marsilius of Padua, The Defender of Peace
– Social Research, Vol. 19, No. 1 (March 1952), pp. 117-121.Review of Marsilius of Padua, The Defender of Peace. Vol. I: Marsilius of Padua and Medieval Political Philosophy by Alan Gewirth.
War Powers Under the Pact; Scope of Presidential Authority in Event of Attack Discussed
– New York Times, April 4, 1949.Excerpt: In James Reston’s dispatch in THE TIMES of March 26 it is shown that the question of who initiates armed action under the Constitution was debated in the earliest years of the Republic, and was a critical point in dispute between Hamilton and… More