With Christopher Wolfe, eds. Georgetown University Press, 2000.
Description from Publisher:
“Public reason” is one of the central concepts in modern liberal political theory. As articulated by John Rawls, it presents a way to overcome the difficulties created by intractable differences among citizens’ religious and moral beliefs by strictly confining the place of such convictions in the public sphere.
Identifying this conception as a key point of conflict, this book presents a debate among contemporary natural law and liberal political theorists on the definition and validity of the idea of public reason. Its distinguished contributors examine the consequences of interpreting public reason more broadly as “right reason,” according to natural law theory, versus understanding it in the narrower sense in which Rawls intended. They test public reason by examining its implications for current issues, confronting the questions of abortion and slavery and matters relating to citizenship.
This energetic exchange advances our understanding of both Rawls’s contribution to political philosophy and the lasting relevance of natural law. It provides new insights into crucial issues facing society today as it points to new ways of thinking about political theory and practice.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Robert P. George and Christopher Wolfe
In Defense of Liberal Public Reason: Are Slavery and Abortion Hard Cases?
Stephen Macedo
Natural Law and Public Reason
Robert P. George and Christopher Wolfe
Abortion, Natural Law, and Public Reason
John Finnis
Abortion, Natural Law, and Liberal Discourse: A Response to John Finnis
Jeffrey Reiman
Citizenship and Public Reason
Paul J. Weithman
Political Liberalism, Pubic Reason, and the Citizen of Faith
Patrick Neal
Contributors
Index