Books
Slavery — A Battle Revisited
– New Leader 41:30 (August 18-25, 1958). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Created Equal: The Complete Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 by Paul Angle.
“Value Consensus” in Democracy: The Issue in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 745-753. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).In the Name of the People: Speeches and Writings of Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859
– Harry V. Jaffa and Robert W. Johannsen, eds. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959).Lincoln and Douglas
– Allen Nevins, New Leader 43:20 (May 1960).Review of Crisis of the House Divided.
Review: The Letters of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen
– The Journal of Southern History 28:2 (May 1962), pp. 251-253. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics
– New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Summary from the Publisher: This is the first of four books by Harry V. Jaffa reprinted by the Claremont Institute in honor of his 80th birthday. This book was originally published by… More
Reconstruction, Old and New
– National Review, April 20, 1965.Review of The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 by Kenneth M. Stampp
The Limits of Dissent
– National Review, September 10, 1968, p. 911.Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by Abe Fortas.
Portrait of a Patriot
– National Review, May 25, 1973. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen.
Partly Federal, Partly National: On the Political Theory of the American Civil War
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Fellows’ Choice
– Hadley Arkes, The Wilson Quarterly 1:3 (Spring 1977), pp. 127-128.Review of Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Inventing the Past
– The St. John's Review 33:1 (Autumn 1981).Equality, Liberty, Wisdom, Morality and Consent in the Idea of Political Freedom
– Interpretation Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 1987).Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
“Who Killed Cock Robin?” A Retrospective on the Bork Nomination and a Reply to “Jaffa Divides the House”
– Seattle University Law Review 13:3 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In an utterance that may have changed the history of the United States, and of the world, Lincoln argued that the grounds upon which one opposed the extension of slavery into the… More
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution
– Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994.Summary from the Publisher: Original Intent and the Framers of the Constitution: A Disputed Question is a unique contribution to the debate, begun by Attorney General Edwin Meese in the… More
Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Professor Jaffa and That Old-Time Religion
– George Anastapalo, in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Excerpt: Mr. Jaffa, even when he is mistaken in the theoretician’s (to be distinguished from the ideologue’s) emphasis that he evidently cannot help but place upon practical… More
Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Why CCRI Is Constitutional
– The Weekly Standard, April 21, 1997.Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The Virtue of Practical Wisdom
– Justice Clarence Thomas, Claremont Institute, February 9, 1999.Excerpt: We gather here tonight in memory of a great man, a great president whose noble words and selfless deeds enabled this great nation to fulfill its promises of equality and liberty… More
In Defense of Special Interests
– The Weekly Standard, January 31, 2000, pp. 13-14.The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Jaffa versus Mansfield by Thomas G. West
– Thomas G. West, Perspectives on Political Science 31:4 (Fall 2002).Excerpt: Harry Jaffa and Harvey Mansfield are two of the ablest among those whose study of America has been shaped and helped by what they learned from Strauss. Both men are patriots. Both… More
American Conservatism and the Present Crisis
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2003.Excerpt: Roger Scruton, writing in the Wall Street Journal last December, declared that “September 11 was a wake up call through which liberals have managed to go on dreaming.… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
The American Founding as the Best Regime
– The Claremont Institute, July 4, 2007.Excerpt: The Preamble of the Constitution crowns its enumeration of the ends of the Constitution by declaring its purpose to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our… More
Dred Scott Revisited
– Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 31:1 (Winter 2008).Essays
Slavery — A Battle Revisited
– New Leader 41:30 (August 18-25, 1958). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Created Equal: The Complete Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 by Paul Angle.
“Value Consensus” in Democracy: The Issue in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 745-753. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).In the Name of the People: Speeches and Writings of Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859
– Harry V. Jaffa and Robert W. Johannsen, eds. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959).Lincoln and Douglas
– Allen Nevins, New Leader 43:20 (May 1960).Review of Crisis of the House Divided.
Review: The Letters of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen
– The Journal of Southern History 28:2 (May 1962), pp. 251-253. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics
– New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Summary from the Publisher: This is the first of four books by Harry V. Jaffa reprinted by the Claremont Institute in honor of his 80th birthday. This book was originally published by… More
Reconstruction, Old and New
– National Review, April 20, 1965.Review of The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 by Kenneth M. Stampp
The Limits of Dissent
– National Review, September 10, 1968, p. 911.Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by Abe Fortas.
Portrait of a Patriot
– National Review, May 25, 1973. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen.
Partly Federal, Partly National: On the Political Theory of the American Civil War
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Fellows’ Choice
– Hadley Arkes, The Wilson Quarterly 1:3 (Spring 1977), pp. 127-128.Review of Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Inventing the Past
– The St. John's Review 33:1 (Autumn 1981).Equality, Liberty, Wisdom, Morality and Consent in the Idea of Political Freedom
– Interpretation Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 1987).Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
“Who Killed Cock Robin?” A Retrospective on the Bork Nomination and a Reply to “Jaffa Divides the House”
– Seattle University Law Review 13:3 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In an utterance that may have changed the history of the United States, and of the world, Lincoln argued that the grounds upon which one opposed the extension of slavery into the… More
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution
– Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994.Summary from the Publisher: Original Intent and the Framers of the Constitution: A Disputed Question is a unique contribution to the debate, begun by Attorney General Edwin Meese in the… More
Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Professor Jaffa and That Old-Time Religion
– George Anastapalo, in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Excerpt: Mr. Jaffa, even when he is mistaken in the theoretician’s (to be distinguished from the ideologue’s) emphasis that he evidently cannot help but place upon practical… More
Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Why CCRI Is Constitutional
– The Weekly Standard, April 21, 1997.Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The Virtue of Practical Wisdom
– Justice Clarence Thomas, Claremont Institute, February 9, 1999.Excerpt: We gather here tonight in memory of a great man, a great president whose noble words and selfless deeds enabled this great nation to fulfill its promises of equality and liberty… More
In Defense of Special Interests
– The Weekly Standard, January 31, 2000, pp. 13-14.The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Jaffa versus Mansfield by Thomas G. West
– Thomas G. West, Perspectives on Political Science 31:4 (Fall 2002).Excerpt: Harry Jaffa and Harvey Mansfield are two of the ablest among those whose study of America has been shaped and helped by what they learned from Strauss. Both men are patriots. Both… More
American Conservatism and the Present Crisis
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2003.Excerpt: Roger Scruton, writing in the Wall Street Journal last December, declared that “September 11 was a wake up call through which liberals have managed to go on dreaming.… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
The American Founding as the Best Regime
– The Claremont Institute, July 4, 2007.Excerpt: The Preamble of the Constitution crowns its enumeration of the ends of the Constitution by declaring its purpose to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our… More
Dred Scott Revisited
– Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 31:1 (Winter 2008).Commentary
Slavery — A Battle Revisited
– New Leader 41:30 (August 18-25, 1958). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Created Equal: The Complete Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 by Paul Angle.
“Value Consensus” in Democracy: The Issue in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 745-753. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).In the Name of the People: Speeches and Writings of Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859
– Harry V. Jaffa and Robert W. Johannsen, eds. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959).Lincoln and Douglas
– Allen Nevins, New Leader 43:20 (May 1960).Review of Crisis of the House Divided.
Review: The Letters of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen
– The Journal of Southern History 28:2 (May 1962), pp. 251-253. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics
– New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Summary from the Publisher: This is the first of four books by Harry V. Jaffa reprinted by the Claremont Institute in honor of his 80th birthday. This book was originally published by… More
Reconstruction, Old and New
– National Review, April 20, 1965.Review of The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 by Kenneth M. Stampp
The Limits of Dissent
– National Review, September 10, 1968, p. 911.Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by Abe Fortas.
Portrait of a Patriot
– National Review, May 25, 1973. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen.
Partly Federal, Partly National: On the Political Theory of the American Civil War
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Fellows’ Choice
– Hadley Arkes, The Wilson Quarterly 1:3 (Spring 1977), pp. 127-128.Review of Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Inventing the Past
– The St. John's Review 33:1 (Autumn 1981).Equality, Liberty, Wisdom, Morality and Consent in the Idea of Political Freedom
– Interpretation Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 1987).Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
“Who Killed Cock Robin?” A Retrospective on the Bork Nomination and a Reply to “Jaffa Divides the House”
– Seattle University Law Review 13:3 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In an utterance that may have changed the history of the United States, and of the world, Lincoln argued that the grounds upon which one opposed the extension of slavery into the… More
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution
– Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994.Summary from the Publisher: Original Intent and the Framers of the Constitution: A Disputed Question is a unique contribution to the debate, begun by Attorney General Edwin Meese in the… More
Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Professor Jaffa and That Old-Time Religion
– George Anastapalo, in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Excerpt: Mr. Jaffa, even when he is mistaken in the theoretician’s (to be distinguished from the ideologue’s) emphasis that he evidently cannot help but place upon practical… More
Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Why CCRI Is Constitutional
– The Weekly Standard, April 21, 1997.Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The Virtue of Practical Wisdom
– Justice Clarence Thomas, Claremont Institute, February 9, 1999.Excerpt: We gather here tonight in memory of a great man, a great president whose noble words and selfless deeds enabled this great nation to fulfill its promises of equality and liberty… More
In Defense of Special Interests
– The Weekly Standard, January 31, 2000, pp. 13-14.The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Jaffa versus Mansfield by Thomas G. West
– Thomas G. West, Perspectives on Political Science 31:4 (Fall 2002).Excerpt: Harry Jaffa and Harvey Mansfield are two of the ablest among those whose study of America has been shaped and helped by what they learned from Strauss. Both men are patriots. Both… More
American Conservatism and the Present Crisis
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2003.Excerpt: Roger Scruton, writing in the Wall Street Journal last December, declared that “September 11 was a wake up call through which liberals have managed to go on dreaming.… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
The American Founding as the Best Regime
– The Claremont Institute, July 4, 2007.Excerpt: The Preamble of the Constitution crowns its enumeration of the ends of the Constitution by declaring its purpose to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our… More
Dred Scott Revisited
– Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 31:1 (Winter 2008).Multimedia
Slavery — A Battle Revisited
– New Leader 41:30 (August 18-25, 1958). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Created Equal: The Complete Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 by Paul Angle.
“Value Consensus” in Democracy: The Issue in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 745-753. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).In the Name of the People: Speeches and Writings of Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859
– Harry V. Jaffa and Robert W. Johannsen, eds. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959).Lincoln and Douglas
– Allen Nevins, New Leader 43:20 (May 1960).Review of Crisis of the House Divided.
Review: The Letters of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen
– The Journal of Southern History 28:2 (May 1962), pp. 251-253. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics
– New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Summary from the Publisher: This is the first of four books by Harry V. Jaffa reprinted by the Claremont Institute in honor of his 80th birthday. This book was originally published by… More
Reconstruction, Old and New
– National Review, April 20, 1965.Review of The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 by Kenneth M. Stampp
The Limits of Dissent
– National Review, September 10, 1968, p. 911.Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by Abe Fortas.
Portrait of a Patriot
– National Review, May 25, 1973. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen.
Partly Federal, Partly National: On the Political Theory of the American Civil War
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Fellows’ Choice
– Hadley Arkes, The Wilson Quarterly 1:3 (Spring 1977), pp. 127-128.Review of Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Inventing the Past
– The St. John's Review 33:1 (Autumn 1981).Equality, Liberty, Wisdom, Morality and Consent in the Idea of Political Freedom
– Interpretation Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 1987).Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
“Who Killed Cock Robin?” A Retrospective on the Bork Nomination and a Reply to “Jaffa Divides the House”
– Seattle University Law Review 13:3 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In an utterance that may have changed the history of the United States, and of the world, Lincoln argued that the grounds upon which one opposed the extension of slavery into the… More
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution
– Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994.Summary from the Publisher: Original Intent and the Framers of the Constitution: A Disputed Question is a unique contribution to the debate, begun by Attorney General Edwin Meese in the… More
Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Professor Jaffa and That Old-Time Religion
– George Anastapalo, in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Excerpt: Mr. Jaffa, even when he is mistaken in the theoretician’s (to be distinguished from the ideologue’s) emphasis that he evidently cannot help but place upon practical… More
Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Why CCRI Is Constitutional
– The Weekly Standard, April 21, 1997.Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The Virtue of Practical Wisdom
– Justice Clarence Thomas, Claremont Institute, February 9, 1999.Excerpt: We gather here tonight in memory of a great man, a great president whose noble words and selfless deeds enabled this great nation to fulfill its promises of equality and liberty… More
In Defense of Special Interests
– The Weekly Standard, January 31, 2000, pp. 13-14.The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Jaffa versus Mansfield by Thomas G. West
– Thomas G. West, Perspectives on Political Science 31:4 (Fall 2002).Excerpt: Harry Jaffa and Harvey Mansfield are two of the ablest among those whose study of America has been shaped and helped by what they learned from Strauss. Both men are patriots. Both… More
American Conservatism and the Present Crisis
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2003.Excerpt: Roger Scruton, writing in the Wall Street Journal last December, declared that “September 11 was a wake up call through which liberals have managed to go on dreaming.… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
The American Founding as the Best Regime
– The Claremont Institute, July 4, 2007.Excerpt: The Preamble of the Constitution crowns its enumeration of the ends of the Constitution by declaring its purpose to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our… More
Dred Scott Revisited
– Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 31:1 (Winter 2008).Teaching
Slavery — A Battle Revisited
– New Leader 41:30 (August 18-25, 1958). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Created Equal: The Complete Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 by Paul Angle.
“Value Consensus” in Democracy: The Issue in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
– The American Political Science Review, Vol. 52, No. 3 (Sep., 1958), pp. 745-753. Reprinted in Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1965).In the Name of the People: Speeches and Writings of Lincoln and Douglas in the Ohio Campaign of 1859
– Harry V. Jaffa and Robert W. Johannsen, eds. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959).Lincoln and Douglas
– Allen Nevins, New Leader 43:20 (May 1960).Review of Crisis of the House Divided.
Review: The Letters of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen
– The Journal of Southern History 28:2 (May 1962), pp. 251-253. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Equality and Liberty: Theory and Practice in American Politics
– New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Summary from the Publisher: This is the first of four books by Harry V. Jaffa reprinted by the Claremont Institute in honor of his 80th birthday. This book was originally published by… More
Reconstruction, Old and New
– National Review, April 20, 1965.Review of The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 by Kenneth M. Stampp
The Limits of Dissent
– National Review, September 10, 1968, p. 911.Review of Concerning Dissent and Civil Disobedience, by Abe Fortas.
Portrait of a Patriot
– National Review, May 25, 1973. Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Review of Stephen A. Douglas by Robert W. Johannsen.
Partly Federal, Partly National: On the Political Theory of the American Civil War
– In Robert A. Goldwin, ed. A Nation of States (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1974). Reprinted in The Conditions of Freedom (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975).Fellows’ Choice
– Hadley Arkes, The Wilson Quarterly 1:3 (Spring 1977), pp. 127-128.Review of Crisis of the House Divided: An Interpretation of the Issues in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Inventing the Past
– The St. John's Review 33:1 (Autumn 1981).Equality, Liberty, Wisdom, Morality and Consent in the Idea of Political Freedom
– Interpretation Vol. 15, No. 1 (January 1987).Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
“Who Killed Cock Robin?” A Retrospective on the Bork Nomination and a Reply to “Jaffa Divides the House”
– Seattle University Law Review 13:3 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In an utterance that may have changed the history of the United States, and of the world, Lincoln argued that the grounds upon which one opposed the extension of slavery into the… More
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution
– Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994.Summary from the Publisher: Original Intent and the Framers of the Constitution: A Disputed Question is a unique contribution to the debate, begun by Attorney General Edwin Meese in the… More
Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Professor Jaffa and That Old-Time Religion
– George Anastapalo, in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Excerpt: Mr. Jaffa, even when he is mistaken in the theoretician’s (to be distinguished from the ideologue’s) emphasis that he evidently cannot help but place upon practical… More
Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Why CCRI Is Constitutional
– The Weekly Standard, April 21, 1997.Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The Virtue of Practical Wisdom
– Justice Clarence Thomas, Claremont Institute, February 9, 1999.Excerpt: We gather here tonight in memory of a great man, a great president whose noble words and selfless deeds enabled this great nation to fulfill its promises of equality and liberty… More
In Defense of Special Interests
– The Weekly Standard, January 31, 2000, pp. 13-14.The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Jaffa versus Mansfield by Thomas G. West
– Thomas G. West, Perspectives on Political Science 31:4 (Fall 2002).Excerpt: Harry Jaffa and Harvey Mansfield are two of the ablest among those whose study of America has been shaped and helped by what they learned from Strauss. Both men are patriots. Both… More
American Conservatism and the Present Crisis
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2003.Excerpt: Roger Scruton, writing in the Wall Street Journal last December, declared that “September 11 was a wake up call through which liberals have managed to go on dreaming.… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
The American Founding as the Best Regime
– The Claremont Institute, July 4, 2007.Excerpt: The Preamble of the Constitution crowns its enumeration of the ends of the Constitution by declaring its purpose to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our… More