Books
Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
Essays
Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
Commentary
Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
Multimedia
Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More
Teaching
Seven Questions for Professor Jaffa
– George Anastaplo, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article poses questions inspired by the four essays collected in Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the… More
What Were the “Original Intentions” of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?
– Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article explains how the doctrine of original intent might be defended as the basis for interpreting the Constitution. The deepest political differences in American history… More
On Jaffa, Lincoln, Marshall, and Original Intent
– Lewis E. Lehrman, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Foreword introduces the article to follow written by Harry V. Jaffa, scholar of Abraham Lincoln’s political philosophy. The Foreward provides background material necessary… More
Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Jaffa
– Bruce Ledewitz, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor Harry V. Jaffa’s article “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?” The Article… More
Professor Harry V. Jaffa Divides the House: A Respectful Protest and a Defense Brief
– Robert L. Stone, Seattle University Law Review 10:3 (1987). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: This Article replies to Professor’ Jaffa’s article, “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?,” and book, The… More
Judge Bork’s Mistake
– National Review, March 4, 1988, pp. 38-40.Judicial Conscience and Natural Rights: A Reply to Professor Ledewitz
– Seattle University Law Review 11:2 (1988). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: In our Spring 1987 issue, Professor Jaffa authored an essay in which he posited that the fundamental principles of equality and other tenets of natural law expressed in the… More
A Constitutional Right to Privacy?
– With Joseph Sobran, National Review, March 24, 1989, pp. 51-53.Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle University Law Review 13:2 (1990). Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
Seven Answers for Professor Anastaplo
– Seattle Law Review 13:375 (1990).Abstract: Professor Jaffa responds to seven questions from Professor Anastaplo.
The Closing of the Conservative Mind: A Dissenting Opinion on Judge Robert H. Bork
– National Review, July 9, 1990, pp. 40-43. Reprinted in Original Intent & the Framers of the Constitution (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1994).Jaffa v. Bork: An Exchange
– National Review, March 21, 1994, pp. 56-57.Graglia’s Quarrel with God: Atheism and Nihilism Masquerading as Constitutional Argument
– Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal Vol. 4, No. 3 (1995).God and Man in Court: Graglia’s Quarrel with God
– National Review, August 14, 1995, pp. 30-32.Abstract: The article presents the author’s response to the comments of law professor Lino A. Graglia on his critique of U.S. Judge Robert Bork and Chief Justice William Rehnquist… More
Storm Over the Constitution
– Lanham: Lexington Books, 1999.Summary from the Publisher: Written by one of America’s foremost political and legal theorists, Storm Over the Constitution examines the arguments of some of the leading proponents of… More
The False Prophets of American Conservatism
– Reprinted by The Claremont Institute, June 11, 2014. In Kenneth L. Grasso and Robert P. Hunt, eds., A Moral Enterprise: Politics, Reason, and the Human Good (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2002.)Excerpt: While the crisis of today does not have the immediacy of the crisis over slavery, its underlying character is the same. It is commonplace today to compare the issue of abortion to… More
Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Spring 2005/06.Excerpt: While quibbling over Harriet Miers’s ill-fated nomination to the Supreme Court, conservatives overlooked the more serious flaw in President Bush’s claim that he would… More
The Disputed Question: Original Intent and the American Soul
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: A Rebuttal
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2005.The Disputed Question: Judicial Activism, Left and Right
– Claremont Review of Books, Winter 2006/07.Excerpt: Professor Michael Uhlmann has given us a devastating indictment of mainstream Supreme Court jurisprudence over the last century, with particular reference to the last half century.… More