Books
Judicial Restraint and the Bill of Rights
– New Republic (May 12, 1958).What the Founders Believed
– New Republic (July 18, 1960).Communist Cases
– New Republic (June 19, 1961).A Panel: The Proper Role of the United States Supreme Court in Civil Liberties Cases
– with D. Dorsen, P. Bator, C. Foote, and C. Reich; Wayne Law Review 10, p. 473 (1964).Politics and the Warren Court
– Joanna Cotler Books, 1965.“For all of the current attacks on the Supreme Court, no sensible critic would argue with the view that our Constitution and courts are basically sound. The crucial issue is whether… More
Homosexuality as Crime in North Carolina
– New Republic (December 12, 1965).Review of “Invitation to an Inquest”
– Commentary (January 1966).Book Review of Invitation to an Inquest, by Walter and Miriam Schneir (1965). Excerpt: United States v. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg wasn’t the Dreyfus, the Mooney, the Sacco-Vanzetti… More
Judicial Review of Police Methods in Law Enforcement: The Role of the Supreme Court of the United States
– Texas Law Review 44 (1966).Excerpt: I have read my share of opinions in criminal cases-more, I have often thought, than my just share-and I have pored over my share of records, darting from witness to witness, from… More
After the Arrest: Interrogation and the Right to Counsel
– New Republic (February 12, 1966).Obscenity Cases
– New Republic (May 27, 1967).Supreme Court: Internal Security Cases
– New Republic (January 6, 1968).Crime, the Courts, and the Old Nixon
– New Republic (June 15, 1968).Pornography and the Courts
– Commentary (November 1968).Review of The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill, by Charles Rembar. Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity… More
Review of “The End of Obscenity”
– Commentary (November 1968).Book Review of The End of Obscenity, by Charles Rembar (1968). Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity cases constituted one of the main issues in the struggle… More
How to Beat Crime
– New Republic (August 30, 1969).On Pornography: Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
– with Stanley Kauffman, Wilson Carey McWilliams, and Marshall Cohen; Public Interest (Winter 1971).Excerpt: The civil libertarian position on obscenity is that if we forget about it, it will go away. We aren’t told to admire the king’s beautiful cloak. We are told not to care… More
Judging the Chicago Trial
– Commentary (January 1971).Excerpt: Julius Hoffman, Thomas Foran, William Kunstler, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin—these are, like Spiro Agnew, household names we… More
Powell’s Day
– New Republic (June 10, 1972).The “Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open” First Amendment: From “Sullivan” to the Pentagon Papers
– Commentary (November 1972).Excerpt: In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, an important and novel decision of great consequence in the law of the First Amendment. Among other things, the… More
The Press and Government: Adversaries without Absolutes
– Freedom at Issue (May-June 1973).Pornography, Censorship and Common Sense
– Reader's Digest (February 18, 1974).The Morality of Consent
– Yale University Press, 1975.Winner of the 1976 Silver Gavel Award of the American Bar Association Chosen as one of the Notable Books of 1975 by the American Library Association “This short but provocative volume . .… More
Essays
Judicial Restraint and the Bill of Rights
– New Republic (May 12, 1958).What the Founders Believed
– New Republic (July 18, 1960).Communist Cases
– New Republic (June 19, 1961).A Panel: The Proper Role of the United States Supreme Court in Civil Liberties Cases
– with D. Dorsen, P. Bator, C. Foote, and C. Reich; Wayne Law Review 10, p. 473 (1964).Politics and the Warren Court
– Joanna Cotler Books, 1965.“For all of the current attacks on the Supreme Court, no sensible critic would argue with the view that our Constitution and courts are basically sound. The crucial issue is whether… More
Homosexuality as Crime in North Carolina
– New Republic (December 12, 1965).Review of “Invitation to an Inquest”
– Commentary (January 1966).Book Review of Invitation to an Inquest, by Walter and Miriam Schneir (1965). Excerpt: United States v. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg wasn’t the Dreyfus, the Mooney, the Sacco-Vanzetti… More
Judicial Review of Police Methods in Law Enforcement: The Role of the Supreme Court of the United States
– Texas Law Review 44 (1966).Excerpt: I have read my share of opinions in criminal cases-more, I have often thought, than my just share-and I have pored over my share of records, darting from witness to witness, from… More
After the Arrest: Interrogation and the Right to Counsel
– New Republic (February 12, 1966).Obscenity Cases
– New Republic (May 27, 1967).Supreme Court: Internal Security Cases
– New Republic (January 6, 1968).Crime, the Courts, and the Old Nixon
– New Republic (June 15, 1968).Pornography and the Courts
– Commentary (November 1968).Review of The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill, by Charles Rembar. Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity… More
Review of “The End of Obscenity”
– Commentary (November 1968).Book Review of The End of Obscenity, by Charles Rembar (1968). Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity cases constituted one of the main issues in the struggle… More
How to Beat Crime
– New Republic (August 30, 1969).On Pornography: Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
– with Stanley Kauffman, Wilson Carey McWilliams, and Marshall Cohen; Public Interest (Winter 1971).Excerpt: The civil libertarian position on obscenity is that if we forget about it, it will go away. We aren’t told to admire the king’s beautiful cloak. We are told not to care… More
Judging the Chicago Trial
– Commentary (January 1971).Excerpt: Julius Hoffman, Thomas Foran, William Kunstler, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin—these are, like Spiro Agnew, household names we… More
Powell’s Day
– New Republic (June 10, 1972).The “Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open” First Amendment: From “Sullivan” to the Pentagon Papers
– Commentary (November 1972).Excerpt: In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, an important and novel decision of great consequence in the law of the First Amendment. Among other things, the… More
The Press and Government: Adversaries without Absolutes
– Freedom at Issue (May-June 1973).Pornography, Censorship and Common Sense
– Reader's Digest (February 18, 1974).The Morality of Consent
– Yale University Press, 1975.Winner of the 1976 Silver Gavel Award of the American Bar Association Chosen as one of the Notable Books of 1975 by the American Library Association “This short but provocative volume . .… More
Commentary
Judicial Restraint and the Bill of Rights
– New Republic (May 12, 1958).What the Founders Believed
– New Republic (July 18, 1960).Communist Cases
– New Republic (June 19, 1961).A Panel: The Proper Role of the United States Supreme Court in Civil Liberties Cases
– with D. Dorsen, P. Bator, C. Foote, and C. Reich; Wayne Law Review 10, p. 473 (1964).Politics and the Warren Court
– Joanna Cotler Books, 1965.“For all of the current attacks on the Supreme Court, no sensible critic would argue with the view that our Constitution and courts are basically sound. The crucial issue is whether… More
Homosexuality as Crime in North Carolina
– New Republic (December 12, 1965).Review of “Invitation to an Inquest”
– Commentary (January 1966).Book Review of Invitation to an Inquest, by Walter and Miriam Schneir (1965). Excerpt: United States v. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg wasn’t the Dreyfus, the Mooney, the Sacco-Vanzetti… More
Judicial Review of Police Methods in Law Enforcement: The Role of the Supreme Court of the United States
– Texas Law Review 44 (1966).Excerpt: I have read my share of opinions in criminal cases-more, I have often thought, than my just share-and I have pored over my share of records, darting from witness to witness, from… More
After the Arrest: Interrogation and the Right to Counsel
– New Republic (February 12, 1966).Obscenity Cases
– New Republic (May 27, 1967).Supreme Court: Internal Security Cases
– New Republic (January 6, 1968).Crime, the Courts, and the Old Nixon
– New Republic (June 15, 1968).Pornography and the Courts
– Commentary (November 1968).Review of The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill, by Charles Rembar. Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity… More
Review of “The End of Obscenity”
– Commentary (November 1968).Book Review of The End of Obscenity, by Charles Rembar (1968). Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity cases constituted one of the main issues in the struggle… More
How to Beat Crime
– New Republic (August 30, 1969).On Pornography: Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
– with Stanley Kauffman, Wilson Carey McWilliams, and Marshall Cohen; Public Interest (Winter 1971).Excerpt: The civil libertarian position on obscenity is that if we forget about it, it will go away. We aren’t told to admire the king’s beautiful cloak. We are told not to care… More
Judging the Chicago Trial
– Commentary (January 1971).Excerpt: Julius Hoffman, Thomas Foran, William Kunstler, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin—these are, like Spiro Agnew, household names we… More
Powell’s Day
– New Republic (June 10, 1972).The “Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open” First Amendment: From “Sullivan” to the Pentagon Papers
– Commentary (November 1972).Excerpt: In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, an important and novel decision of great consequence in the law of the First Amendment. Among other things, the… More
The Press and Government: Adversaries without Absolutes
– Freedom at Issue (May-June 1973).Pornography, Censorship and Common Sense
– Reader's Digest (February 18, 1974).The Morality of Consent
– Yale University Press, 1975.Winner of the 1976 Silver Gavel Award of the American Bar Association Chosen as one of the Notable Books of 1975 by the American Library Association “This short but provocative volume . .… More
Multimedia
Judicial Restraint and the Bill of Rights
– New Republic (May 12, 1958).What the Founders Believed
– New Republic (July 18, 1960).Communist Cases
– New Republic (June 19, 1961).A Panel: The Proper Role of the United States Supreme Court in Civil Liberties Cases
– with D. Dorsen, P. Bator, C. Foote, and C. Reich; Wayne Law Review 10, p. 473 (1964).Politics and the Warren Court
– Joanna Cotler Books, 1965.“For all of the current attacks on the Supreme Court, no sensible critic would argue with the view that our Constitution and courts are basically sound. The crucial issue is whether… More
Homosexuality as Crime in North Carolina
– New Republic (December 12, 1965).Review of “Invitation to an Inquest”
– Commentary (January 1966).Book Review of Invitation to an Inquest, by Walter and Miriam Schneir (1965). Excerpt: United States v. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg wasn’t the Dreyfus, the Mooney, the Sacco-Vanzetti… More
Judicial Review of Police Methods in Law Enforcement: The Role of the Supreme Court of the United States
– Texas Law Review 44 (1966).Excerpt: I have read my share of opinions in criminal cases-more, I have often thought, than my just share-and I have pored over my share of records, darting from witness to witness, from… More
After the Arrest: Interrogation and the Right to Counsel
– New Republic (February 12, 1966).Obscenity Cases
– New Republic (May 27, 1967).Supreme Court: Internal Security Cases
– New Republic (January 6, 1968).Crime, the Courts, and the Old Nixon
– New Republic (June 15, 1968).Pornography and the Courts
– Commentary (November 1968).Review of The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill, by Charles Rembar. Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity… More
Review of “The End of Obscenity”
– Commentary (November 1968).Book Review of The End of Obscenity, by Charles Rembar (1968). Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity cases constituted one of the main issues in the struggle… More
How to Beat Crime
– New Republic (August 30, 1969).On Pornography: Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
– with Stanley Kauffman, Wilson Carey McWilliams, and Marshall Cohen; Public Interest (Winter 1971).Excerpt: The civil libertarian position on obscenity is that if we forget about it, it will go away. We aren’t told to admire the king’s beautiful cloak. We are told not to care… More
Judging the Chicago Trial
– Commentary (January 1971).Excerpt: Julius Hoffman, Thomas Foran, William Kunstler, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin—these are, like Spiro Agnew, household names we… More
Powell’s Day
– New Republic (June 10, 1972).The “Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open” First Amendment: From “Sullivan” to the Pentagon Papers
– Commentary (November 1972).Excerpt: In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, an important and novel decision of great consequence in the law of the First Amendment. Among other things, the… More
The Press and Government: Adversaries without Absolutes
– Freedom at Issue (May-June 1973).Pornography, Censorship and Common Sense
– Reader's Digest (February 18, 1974).The Morality of Consent
– Yale University Press, 1975.Winner of the 1976 Silver Gavel Award of the American Bar Association Chosen as one of the Notable Books of 1975 by the American Library Association “This short but provocative volume . .… More
Teaching
Judicial Restraint and the Bill of Rights
– New Republic (May 12, 1958).What the Founders Believed
– New Republic (July 18, 1960).Communist Cases
– New Republic (June 19, 1961).A Panel: The Proper Role of the United States Supreme Court in Civil Liberties Cases
– with D. Dorsen, P. Bator, C. Foote, and C. Reich; Wayne Law Review 10, p. 473 (1964).Politics and the Warren Court
– Joanna Cotler Books, 1965.“For all of the current attacks on the Supreme Court, no sensible critic would argue with the view that our Constitution and courts are basically sound. The crucial issue is whether… More
Homosexuality as Crime in North Carolina
– New Republic (December 12, 1965).Review of “Invitation to an Inquest”
– Commentary (January 1966).Book Review of Invitation to an Inquest, by Walter and Miriam Schneir (1965). Excerpt: United States v. Julius and Ethel Rosenberg wasn’t the Dreyfus, the Mooney, the Sacco-Vanzetti… More
Judicial Review of Police Methods in Law Enforcement: The Role of the Supreme Court of the United States
– Texas Law Review 44 (1966).Excerpt: I have read my share of opinions in criminal cases-more, I have often thought, than my just share-and I have pored over my share of records, darting from witness to witness, from… More
After the Arrest: Interrogation and the Right to Counsel
– New Republic (February 12, 1966).Obscenity Cases
– New Republic (May 27, 1967).Supreme Court: Internal Security Cases
– New Republic (January 6, 1968).Crime, the Courts, and the Old Nixon
– New Republic (June 15, 1968).Pornography and the Courts
– Commentary (November 1968).Review of The End of Obscenity: The Trials of Lady Chatterley, Tropic of Cancer, and Fanny Hill, by Charles Rembar. Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity… More
Review of “The End of Obscenity”
– Commentary (November 1968).Book Review of The End of Obscenity, by Charles Rembar (1968). Excerpt: “Permissive decisions by the Supreme Court in obscenity cases constituted one of the main issues in the struggle… More
How to Beat Crime
– New Republic (August 30, 1969).On Pornography: Concurring and Dissenting Opinions
– with Stanley Kauffman, Wilson Carey McWilliams, and Marshall Cohen; Public Interest (Winter 1971).Excerpt: The civil libertarian position on obscenity is that if we forget about it, it will go away. We aren’t told to admire the king’s beautiful cloak. We are told not to care… More
Judging the Chicago Trial
– Commentary (January 1971).Excerpt: Julius Hoffman, Thomas Foran, William Kunstler, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Rennie Davis, Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin—these are, like Spiro Agnew, household names we… More
Powell’s Day
– New Republic (June 10, 1972).The “Uninhibited, Robust, and Wide-Open” First Amendment: From “Sullivan” to the Pentagon Papers
– Commentary (November 1972).Excerpt: In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, an important and novel decision of great consequence in the law of the First Amendment. Among other things, the… More
The Press and Government: Adversaries without Absolutes
– Freedom at Issue (May-June 1973).Pornography, Censorship and Common Sense
– Reader's Digest (February 18, 1974).The Morality of Consent
– Yale University Press, 1975.Winner of the 1976 Silver Gavel Award of the American Bar Association Chosen as one of the Notable Books of 1975 by the American Library Association “This short but provocative volume . .… More